Post by account_disabled on Nov 27, 2023 9:42:12 GMT 3
“nofollow”.” Shouldn’t that be ‘all external links’ counted as nofollow in case folks think they are creating dangling pages? Get what you mean though. I’m forever testing out various nofollow methods on internal structures. Probably better off link building but hey it’s not called optimisation for nothing Andrew Shotland December 3, 2008 at 9:15 pm Actually Hobo nofollow in a meta robots tag (not a “rel” tag) causes all links on the tagged page to be t
agged as nofollow. Hobo December 4, 2008 at 7:48 am The reason Asia Mobile Number List
I mention it is I am getting strange results with meta nofollow tests on a few sites. misunderstanding the idea of dangling pages. Experiments in Cyberspace December 4, 2008 at 9:41 am As a matter of fact I consider use of meta nofollow dangerous (you can later add a link, etc and forget the meta tag). Using it at the link level is always more comfortable. Thanks for the article, nice and to the point. Andrew Shotland December 4, 2008 at 9:47 am Note to all commenters – I am leaving the above comment on despite the spammy profile
name because: 1. It’s a good comment with the appropriate degree of flattery 2. I love the profile name and it’s my blog, so there. Marty December 4, 2008 at 7:11 pm Of course, Google would like us to never noFollow ACCEPT when it fucks with their algorithm, as in castrating you if you fail to NoFollow paid adverts. In reality, the siloing concept purveyed, initially by Bruce Clay years past, is a good one–herding bots into SEO funnels. Rand Fishkin advocates not spending PR on useless pages, which is what I subscribe to. The point is to not overkill. Google does a pretty good job of figuring out what is what. We like simple things like deciding that the bots will crawl a keyword rich category name as opposed to say a date.
agged as nofollow. Hobo December 4, 2008 at 7:48 am The reason Asia Mobile Number List
I mention it is I am getting strange results with meta nofollow tests on a few sites. misunderstanding the idea of dangling pages. Experiments in Cyberspace December 4, 2008 at 9:41 am As a matter of fact I consider use of meta nofollow dangerous (you can later add a link, etc and forget the meta tag). Using it at the link level is always more comfortable. Thanks for the article, nice and to the point. Andrew Shotland December 4, 2008 at 9:47 am Note to all commenters – I am leaving the above comment on despite the spammy profile
name because: 1. It’s a good comment with the appropriate degree of flattery 2. I love the profile name and it’s my blog, so there. Marty December 4, 2008 at 7:11 pm Of course, Google would like us to never noFollow ACCEPT when it fucks with their algorithm, as in castrating you if you fail to NoFollow paid adverts. In reality, the siloing concept purveyed, initially by Bruce Clay years past, is a good one–herding bots into SEO funnels. Rand Fishkin advocates not spending PR on useless pages, which is what I subscribe to. The point is to not overkill. Google does a pretty good job of figuring out what is what. We like simple things like deciding that the bots will crawl a keyword rich category name as opposed to say a date.